Return to CreateDebate.comhswanson • Join this debate community

Swanson


18lkelly's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of 18lkelly's arguments, looking across every debate.
1 point

I kind of agree with you, but after World War II, the Israelis had no where else to go. Did the United Nations just want them to die out? No. So that's why they gave them the only open land near them. I just don't think they should start a war about it, because things would be way easier if they just shared the land.

1 point

I agree with Travis because the Israelis have had the land for 3,000+ years, and everyone was under control by the Turks until the Israelis came and tookover. So technically, the Jews have had the land longer than the Palestinians.

2 points

Even though the Palestinians came first, the Israelis have had a really tough history. During World War II, the Nazis killed 6 million of them, so don't you think they at least deserve land? Plus the Palestinians weren't ever really there - Mark Twain went to Palestine in the 1800s, and he said that it was bare, and he never saw people. The Israelis don't even need that much land - except no one is willing to give it to them.

2 points

I support the Israelis, and think that the Israelis should share their land with the Palestinians and stop fighting. They are killing all the innocent Palestinians, just because they want the land. Israelis have already taken over 78% of the Palestinians, and 10,000 Palestinians are in jail, with no trial. They should just share the land, because the Israelis won't take up that much room (Israel can fit into Ohio 7 times).



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]