Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 4 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 80% |
Arguments: | 4 |
Debates: | 0 |
I kind of agree with you, but after World War II, the Israelis had no where else to go. Did the United Nations just want them to die out? No. So that's why they gave them the only open land near them. I just don't think they should start a war about it, because things would be way easier if they just shared the land.
Even though the Palestinians came first, the Israelis have had a really tough history. During World War II, the Nazis killed 6 million of them, so don't you think they at least deserve land? Plus the Palestinians weren't ever really there - Mark Twain went to Palestine in the 1800s, and he said that it was bare, and he never saw people. The Israelis don't even need that much land - except no one is willing to give it to them.
I support the Israelis, and think that the Israelis should share their land with the Palestinians and stop fighting. They are killing all the innocent Palestinians, just because they want the land. Israelis have already taken over 78% of the Palestinians, and 10,000 Palestinians are in jail, with no trial. They should just share the land, because the Israelis won't take up that much room (Israel can fit into Ohio 7 times).
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |