Return to CreateDebate.comhswanson • Join this debate community

Swanson


22whoffman's Waterfall RSS

This personal waterfall shows you all of 22whoffman's arguments, looking across every debate.
22whoffman(4) Clarified
1 point

I agree because they both have a connection with Jerusalem so they should try something that helps them both not one or the other. But, Eli it might be a challenge because of religion so they might not get along as well.

3 points

They should both be able to have the land because of religion. I know that religion is a huge part of both the Arabs and even the Jews. But the holy city of Jerusalem is big in both parts of the religion that they both follow. But with both religions, it is hard to come to a consensus because they keep on arguing saying that God gave it to them or that it never mentioned it in the Koran. But with the Jews, they forced their way into the land that they had and the Arabs they were not willing to let them come back even though they have been living together before this even happened.

0 points

Sorry Aiden, but just because they left and chose to see if they can find a better life that does not mean that they can just take it back because they had a hard time. Then they thought that since they have been through a lot they can take back more land than they had originally.

1 point

But Aiden they have to work it out in some way they can't be judged by what they have for a democracy. Even if Palestinians aren't fully developed that means that they need help from the Jews.

3 points

When the Israelis came back they forced the land to be theirs but they left and then the British took their side and they got more land than the Arabs. So if they both want land they have to make it even and have both religions to have half each not one have more.

2 points

But they left and that means that they left the land. And so the Arabs took the land that they found back so that means that they lost it because they left.



Results Per Page: [12] [24] [48] [96]